[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Subject: Holcombe's 1870 Liberty Co Census Fiasco My Reference No: L-000224-1 Charles R. Holcombe was a carpetbagger. A short history bite may be needed by those readers who slept through the lessons on the Civil War, or the War Between the States, or my favorite euphemism: The War of Yankee Aggression. :-) For those who are really into the name of that conflict, see Groover's "Sweet Land of Liberty", a history of Liberty County, Georgia, for two contributed essays, one supporting the practice of calling it the Civil War and the other (written by my lawyer-cousin Mark Baxter) supporting the term The War Between the States. I caution the reader to triple check any factual information found in Groover's book. It needs hundreds of corrections. But, I digress. Carpetbaggers were Yankees who moved to the South in the late 1860s to make their fame and fortune at the expense of the defeated Confederates. Okay, out of respect to my late mother, a native of Ohio, I concede that one or two carpetbaggers may have been virtuous men, but most came to take advantage of the situation. Some were outright scoundrels, who cheated, lied and bullied themselves into positions of influence and authority. Their nickname came from the fact that some arrived with their personal belongings in a popular-style satchel made of colorful carpet, hence "carpetbagger". My friend and cousin, Elmer O. Parker, of Columbia, SC, provided some information on the 1870 census. Elmer grew up in present Long Co, GA, and is related to me twice through the Baxter family. He spent most of his adult life as an archivist in the military history section of National Archives in Washington, DC. He is also a genealogist. Elmer told me that "Yankee transplants" recorded the census of 1870 in numerous counties throughout the South. Apparently the administration in Washington did not trust defeated southerners to do the job correctly. I suppose it was also a way to offer work to those they considered worthy. By his own hand, on 1 Jun 1870, Charles R. Holcombe, listed himself as head of a household in Liberty Co, with McIntosh, GA his post office. He was a 27-year old lawyer, had been born in Maryland. His real estate was valued (by himself) at $3,500, his personal property at $2,500. Living with him was a female, assumed to have been his wife. The 1870 census did not specify relationships. She was called Helen M. Holcombe. She was 24 years old, had been born in New Hampshire. Her real estate was valued (by Holcombe) at $1,200, her personal property at $1,000. [Note: Those personal property values, if accurate and not Yankee bragging, must have included jewelry, stocks, bonds and the like. With slavery over, it was difficult to have so much personal property without owning such items. -CCG] When it was determined that the 1870 Census needed to be redone (more on that below), John E. Martin found the Holcombes living in the home of J. Axon Girardeau. Martin made one serious mistake in his census report, perhaps deliberate in an attempt to insult the Holcombes. He listed their place of birth as Georgia. He called the female Nelly M. Holcombe, Nelly being a nickname for Helen. He reduced the value of Holcombe's personal property to $1,200 and increased the value of Nelly's real estate to $2,500. He increased Nelly's age to 25. Perhaps she had had a birthday. As a carpetbagger lawyer, it is likely Holcombe did not have many clients in Liberty Co. Whether he was sent there specifically to take the census or was there when the opportunity arose, I cannot say. However, I have been told that the enumerators were paid by the number of lines in the report they filed. It was a perfect opportunity for a shyster like Holcombe to make some additional money. It angers me to envision the intellectual arrogance that prompted Holcombe to pad the census by making up names to enlarge some existing families. In other cases he made up entire families. Apparently he did not think that any local resident would examine the record before he sent it to Washington, but it is obvious that someone did. They recognized the fiasco his census was, reported it, and the authorities decided that a new census was needed. Holcombe's last record was dated in late August, 1870. I have a mental picture of Holcombe sitting at a table in a tavern, collecting information from locals as they entered. If he did visit these families, his notes must have been so cryptic he could not properly transcribe them when he got home. The official census record was written on huge sheets of paper, perhaps 15 inches by 15 inches. It is unlikely that many enumerators took those sheets with them as they rode about the countryside on horseback. Rather, they made notes on scraps of paper and later transcribed them onto the official sheets. That reading of short notes presented an opportunity for additional mistakes. Sometimes the person writing the actual record was not even the census taker, but someone with good handwriting. To illustrate Holcombe's incompetence when he was listing actual families, I include an incomplete list of the most obvious mistakes made in naming heads of household. The first name on each line is Holcombe's contribution, the second the correct name. Jackson McDaniel - Jackson Landrum McDonald G. Turner Dunham - George Troup Dunham S. Miles Chapman - Sheldon Madison Chapman Aaron Flowers - Allen Barfield Flowers Solon S. Martin - Samuel Spencer Martin Simon G. Baxter - Stephen Godfrey Baxter Harrison Parker - Hampton Cling Parker Jonas M. Parker - Jasper Newton Parker Saunders Hearn - Hendley Solomon Horne Clarence Groover - Charles A. Groover Grove & Marcy Knight - George & Mary Knight W. Burns Dunham - William Bradwell Dunham Henry F. Horne and Hardy Horner [2 bad entries] - Hendley Foxworth Horne Most of the above lived in the area that is now the western part of Long Co. G. T. Dunham was a prominent merchant. H. C. Parker and H. F. Horne were influential plantation owners, Parker having been a member of the Georgia legislature. It is shameful that Holcombe did not record these families correctly. On 1 November 1870, a crew of six started a recount. The names of some residents appear only in the later list because Holcombe was stopped before he had finished. Those six were locals, namely John E. Martin, John Sidney Fleming, John S. Norman, Alexander S. Quarterman, Robert Quarterman Baker and William S. Norman. The official census record on microfilm begins with the non-commital letter copied below. Unfortunately, not only does the record include Holcombe's pages, but they were bound into the front of the record. The uninformed researcher may find a family in Holcombe's record and remain unaware that a more nearly correct second record exists later in the document. Department of the Interior Census Office Washington, D. C., 2 May 1872 Subdivision 78 of Georgia was formerly the entire County of Liberty and consists of the following 231 pages of Schedule I, and was the first enumeration of that County. The Second Enumeration consists of Subdivisions 167, 177, 178, 179, 180 and 181 and their Schedules I follow these for 78. [s] Lockwood X. May for Chief of Division of Results There were 281 pages of Schedule I for Subdivision 78, not 231 pages. Note that Mr. May failed to report why there had been a second enumeration and he failed to warn the researcher that there were serious problems with the Subdivision 78 (Holcombe's) record. Surely by now the reader can see that Holcombe's record is worthless and, worse than that, misleading. Many who reference this record are not aware of Holcombe's fiasco, nor are they aware that the census was taken twice in 1870. C. Calder Garrason